The Eye of The Sahara IS the Location of Atlantis

Lost Ancient Civilization & The Richat Structure

The Eye of Africa is not just the most likely location of Atlantis, but the connection of this new evidence I’m about share makes this case so compelling that it’s practically definitive. In my first two videos on the topic of The Lost City of Atlantis, I connected the dots on more than a dozen similarities between Plato’s description of Atlantis, to that of the Richat Structure, which is commonly referred to as the Eye of the Sahara and is located in a remote region of North West Africa, in the country of Mauritania. Atlantis has been hidden in plain sight for thousands of years.

Help support me in my effort to expose truth, on my Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/BrightInsight

My channel discusses many different topics including Lost Ancient Human Civilizations, Intuition, Spirituality, Corruption, and various current events.

Thank you for your support!


Lost city of Atlantis REVEALED?

This is a series of videos from two different Youtube Channels talking about their theories on Atlantis, its location, and Platos insights.

The Lost City of Atlantis - Hidden in Plain Sight - Advanced Ancient Human Civilization: Part 1

Not only did the lost city of Atlantis actually exist, but its true location has been hiding in plain sight for thousands of years, completely unnoticed, as we’ve been looking in all the wrong places...Since everyone assumes that it must be under the ocean somewhere, such as in the depths of the Atlantic Ocean or the Mediterranean Sea, which have long been considered to be the most likely places for its existence. And no, I am not about to suggest that Antarctica is the hidden location of Atlantis, either. Because in this video, I am going to connect the dots on the exact words that Plato used to describe Atlantis, its location, and the geographical land features that surround it, which were recorded in Plato’s dialogues, the Critias and Timaeus. And the details that Plato shared of Atlantis, which I’m about to share with you in side by side comparison, will show you that the Richat Structure located in Mauritania Africa, also commonly referred to as the Eye of the Sahara, or the Eye of Africa…is the most likely location for the lost city of Atlantis.

EDIT: I have received many comments stating something to the effect of "This site (the Richat) is natural, so it's not Atlantis" Here is my response, and I will be discussing this in detail in part 2: Why would the Richat being a natural formation exclude it from being Atlantis? Civilizations have settled on natural geological land features throughout history, including today. And with the massive dimensions of Atlantis, do to the math on the circumferences of those 3 circles of water. Just how much digging/dredging would that require? So obviously it would make sense for Atlantis to have been built on a natural formation. Thanks for watching! There are MANY details about Plato’s description of Atlantis and its location that were not discussed in this video. I’ll be posting Part 2 (probably a week from now), which will include many fascinating aspects about the capital of Atlantis, and its 10-city empire. Help support me on my Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/BrightInsight Cheers, - Jimmy EDIT: At around the 16:06 mark, I meant to say "lower", not "higher", in reference to the earths sea levels 12K years ago. Point is still the same, in that there is a gap between sea levels and the Richat's elevation about sea level.

This is How We Know Atlantis Existed…AND Where – Lost Ancient Civilization Hidden in Plain Sight: Part 2

Make no mistake, the Richat Structure matches far more aspects of the description of the lost city of Atlantis than any other proposed site from around the world, including the most significant and precise details described by Plato. The Eye of the Sahara is the most likely location for Atlantis, and should be excavated immediately.


NEW THEORY: The Lost Island of Atlantis Revealed | Ancient Architects: Part 1

Recently, Bright Insight made a fantastic video presenting the theory put forward by George S. Alexander and Natalis Rosen that the strange natural formation known as the Richat Structure in Mauritania, Africa, is the location of Atlantis, but on closer inspection on the writings of Plato I have to respectfully disagree. In this video I show you exactly where I believe Atlantis was - a sunken island in the North Atlantic Ocean, that appears to fit all of Plato's claims.

Watch Bright Insight's video: https://youtu.be/oDoM4BmoDQM

Watch Lost History Channel's video: https://youtu.be/E8a4gHwLjPE

PLEASE READ: People are saying the same comments and I’m trying to be respectful so I’ll just say this in response:

1. Antarctica is uplifting quickly because the ice on top is melting. This is called isostatic uplift as it regains equilibrium. This is why it is happening. Therefore as there is no huge ice sheet on Africa, comparatively, it cannot happen.

2. “Mammoths” is a word coined in the 17th century. The Ancient Greeks didn’t have a word for mammoths and the Greek Elephas could be referring to mammoths which were in abundance in north west Europe.

3. The water features - the channels that sweep across Western Africa are well documented, studied and understood and are Creataceous and Tertiary in age. That’s when they formed.

4. 11,600 years ago, there is no evidence for deep sea water covering North Africa. Sea level was far lower and Africa hasn’t risen greatly. There are reams of data available for anyone to review and pick at.

5. Salt springs are not uncommon. They are called brine springs. There are a number in the UK, many in New York State, Illinois, various locations across Africa. They are not unusual at all, the salt comes from halite deposits in the crust.

6. Plato’s island of Atlantis had a rectangular plain specifically 4000 stadia in length and very specifically surrounded by mountains on all sides. I see no mountain-surrounded plain at Richat.

I am not disrespecting Jimmy, I have no agenda, I just disagree because I have a background in science and I already know the above factors. If you can argue against these above points by producing physical evidence I will 100% hold my hands up and take it back. I just want the truth and although my theory has holes, every Atlantis theory does. I just think Atlantis in a landlocked continent, which is well understood geologically is a bigger stretch than a sunken continent in the Atlantic. Randall Carlson also agrees that Richat is not Atlantis because of these same points. I’m trying to be respectful and I welcome constructive criticism but I urge everyone to do a little research and to not believe anyone including me at face value.

Thank you.

The Lost Island of Atlantis Revealed | Ancient Architects: Part 2

The Lost Island of Atlantis is a true ancient mystery. As we know there are a number of hypotheses on the table - the Richat structure, The Azores, Antarctica and of course, Frisland in the North Atlantic Ocean. In my previous video I made the claim that a now lost island known as Frisland was the true identity of Plato’s Atlantis and in this video I will look into this hypothesis in greater, technical and scientific detail as we find out whether or not this really could be the fabled island we have long been searching for. Was it above the water level 11,600 years ago? Was it covered in ice? Could it really have fallen beneath the waves at the end of the Younger Dryas Event? Find out by watching this video.


The Sacred History of the Rosicrucians - (Part I)

Join us as we explore the heritage and importance of Atlantis and ancient Egypt in THE SACRED HISTORY OF THE ROSICRUCIANS. (The first episode in our nine part series!)

https://www.rosicrucian.org

Buddy BakerComment